The Man Booker International Prize 2016, and The Shadow Jury’s Judging Commences


The long list for the Man Booker International Prize was announced last Thursday, and with it arrived the focus of my reading for the next several weeks. I think I have read fewer titles than my fellow jury members, but that doesn’t mean I’m any less ardent in my intention to read them all.

As you can see I have A Strangeness in my Mind by Orhan Pamuk, The Four Books by Yan Lianke, and White Hunger by Aki Ollikainen. I have Tram  83 downloaded on my iPad, Mend The Living to be gifted from Mookse, and I’m already reading The Story of The Lost Child by Elena Ferrante on my kindle, having read the first three of the Neapolitan novels previously. I’m particularly thrilled to see Orhan Pamuk and Elena Ferrante on the long list; surely they will advance to the finals if I make an early prediction.

The Shadow Jury has an official statement, thanks to Tony of Tony’s Reading List, which I will share with you here:

“The Shadow Panel for the 2016 Man Booker International Prize congratulates the official judges on curating a long list of thirteen fascinating titles, a selection containing many familiar names, but with enough surprise inclusions to keep us on our toes. We are particularly pleased about the geographical spread of the list; with seven of the thirteen books originating from outside Europe, the longlist has a truly global feel, which was certainly not the case with the final Independent Foreign Fiction Prize longlist.

Of course, as with any subjective selection, there are some areas for discussion. Firstly, we note that female authors are underrepresented, with just four of the thirteen titles written by women. We share the concerns Katy Derbyshire expressed in her piece for The Guardian and would certainly like to see more books by women translated into English. However, we also acknowledge that the figure of 30% is close to the current percentage of translated fiction written by women published in English – and that the percentage among the submitted titles may have been even lower. Unfortunately, with the list of submissions a secret, we are unable to test that suspicion.

Despite the pleasing geographical spread, some areas of the world have missed out. There is nothing from the Arabic-speaking world, and Russian, once again, seems to have fallen out of favour. The largest oversight, however (and one also referred to by Eileen Battersby in her commentary in The Irish Times), is the total omission of books in the Spanish language. In a very strong year for Spanish-language literature in English, we find it surprising (to say the least) that not one of these books made it onto the final list. We would like to mention just a few of these books at this stage to support our point: The Illogic of Kassel by Enrique Vila-Matas; In the Night of Time by Antonio Muñoz Molina; The Boy Who Stole Attila’s Horse by Iván Repila; Signs Preceding the End of the World by Yuri Herrera; My Documents by Alejandro Zambra; Thus Bad Begins by Javier Marías. Of course, some of these titles may not have been submitted (again, we are unable to clarify this), but we do find this oversight puzzling.

Still, despite these issues (and the omission of László Krasznahorkai’s Seiobo There Below, winner of the American-based 2014 Best Translated Book Award, when one of the MBIP judges was on the panel), the Shadow Panel is happy to accept the official judges’ decision and will not be calling any titles in this year. However, as always, we reserve the right to create our own shortlist, one which may diverge from the official decision. We look forward to reading, reviewing and discussing the thirteen long-listed titles – and we hope the official judges will enjoy seeing our take on their decisions.”

So, the judging of the Man Booker International Prize begins by us, the readers, and the Shadow Jury of 2016, who surely are as passionate about literature as the official judges.

19 thoughts on “The Man Booker International Prize 2016, and The Shadow Jury’s Judging Commences”

  1. The only nominee I really know is Eka Kurniawan for his novel Man Tiger, simply because he is a fellow Indonesian. And I haven’t even read his books!

    I am looking forward to the onslaught of reviews of the longlisted books. It will help me decide if I want to invest in reading some of them at least.


    1. I have not read very many of the long list, much to my chagrin. But, it’s always so enlightening to learn of these authors, to be exposed to the world of which they write. I didn’t know you were Indonesian; how wonderful!


    1. I think it would be almost impossible not to enjoy one of the Neapolitan novels. Elena Ferrante has a way of eliciting passion, particularly in my Italian blood. As I’m reading through this I find myself quite judgemental of Elena, where before I criticized Lila in my mind…which of us is every right all the time? I’m interested to see where their story ends.


  2. I haven’t read any book from the list although I have Pamuk’s novel waiting to be read for quite some time… and also keeping my fingers crossed for him 🙂


    1. The first book of Pamuk’s I ever read was Snow, which I loved immediately. The Museum of Innocence was also quite mesmerizing, but his obsession began to grow old for me after awhile. I have not read The Silent House, nor obviously this one, but I am anxious to begin.


  3. How fortuitous that most are easily available in the US so I can read along with you. As with the regular Booker long list I plan to read the ones first that I think probably WON’t make the short list, since it would be difficult to stay enthused about them after they are out of the running.
    I think I have linked in to all of the shadow jury members’ blogs and have enjoyed reading about what you all think SHOULD have made the list but didn’t. Looking forward to all your reviews. Now Back to reading!


    1. It is indeed fortuitous, so many times for the IFFP (Independent Foreign Fiction Prize) I had to write the publishers as the novel was nowhere to be found in the United States. An interesting plan of yours, to read what might not make it, although that is so hard to predict for me. One year, the book I liked the least (okay, loathed) won the IFFP. I’m glad you are following along with us, and if you write a book blog I’d love to visit you. Otherwise, I’ll have to be content with whatever comments you leave us. xo


  4. I have read several books of Orhan Pamuk and enjoyed all of them.All the others on the list sound good reading. I have read Ferrante partly and got diverted to other projects.
    Thank you.


    1. Me, too! Orhan Pamuk’s books are great. Perhaps you will pick up Ferrante’s again? They are so powerful to me. (Thanks for the insightful article on the Guardian, too.)


  5. The only one I’ve read from the list is White Hunger. One good thing about that one is that it’s short!
    Looking forward to following along with the shadow jury!


    1. I haven’t read White Hunger yet, but Peirene Press was so gracious to send it my way. There’s nothing that they’ve published which I haven’t been strongly effected by. The Mussel Feast and Dead Lake in particular. So glad you’re interested in the Jury’s thoughts, Naomi! xoxo

      Liked by 1 person

    1. I was crazy about Snow, and now I’m looking forward to A Strangeness in My Mind. Turkey is a country which has long fascinated me, and Pamuk tells of it so beautifully.


  6. I loved the list this time around. It was very diverse though I was disappointed as well that certain regions are completely missing in the longlist. Can’t wait to hear your thoughts on the titles!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s