The Infatuations by Javier Marias

“…the reality is that anyone can destroy us, just as anyone can conquer us, and that is our essential fragility.” 

The Infatuations begins with Maria Dolz, a meek and submissive woman who works at a publishing house, relating how she observes a married couple at a local cafe in Madrid nearly every day. She is obsessed with watching them from several tables away, although she isn’t aware that they, however briefly, have noticed her in turn. They have even gone so far as to nickname her The Prudent Young Woman. It is through this young woman’s eyes that the story is revealed, a story ostensibly involving a murder, but actually discussing such themes as envy. Death. And, of course, the way infatuations can manipulate our lives.

The marriage of Miguel Desvern (sometimes written Deverne) and Luisa comes to an abrupt end early on in the novel when he is found stabbed to death by a homeless man who believes that Miguel was responsible for the prostitution of his two daughters. Although Miguel is in the operating theater five hours, it is impossible to save him.

Miguel’s widow, Luisa, is so distraught she can barely care for herself let alone their two children. After Maria observes the mother disinterestedly sitting with her young daughter and son as they eat an ice cream, she brings herself to comfort Luisa and is invited to their home. Their conversation is interrupted by two visitors, one of whom is Javier Diaz-Varela, who apparently has a place in this home as a much needed source of strength.

When Diaz-Varela sees Maria at a museum he invites her for a drink, and the two begin a relationship. But, it is clear that Maria is the one who is infatuated with Javier, while his infatuations lie elsewhere.

One day Diaz-Varela tells Maria the story of a colonel who, though believed dead through a terrible encounter with a sword, run over by two men sent to save him, and thrown into a pit next to a mound of dead bodies, actually lives. He returns to his wife, only to have found that she has carried on with her life in his absence, never for a moment believing that he would return. This novella by Honore de Balzac, Le Colonel Chabert, is used by Diaz-Varela “as evidence that the dead are fine where they are and should never come back, even if their death was untimely and unjust, stupid, gratuitous and unfortunate like that of Desvern, and even if there was no risk of them ever reappearing.” (p. 143)

This is a point that is brought up several times through the novel; that the return of someone from the dead would be more of a disadvantage to the living than an advantage. It is a point of view which behooves some of the characters more than others.

As I read this novel, I found myself marking several passage concerning death with sticky notes. They struck me in particular as I, too, have had the experience of being a widow. Of mourning the loss of a husband and wondering how to carry on alone with my son. For those reasons, I can empathize more with the widow Julia than I can with the meek and submissive Maria. I leave them here in order of how I encountered them:

“That’s another of the problems when one suffers a misfortune: the effects on the victim far outlast the patience of those prepared to listen and accompany her, unconditional support never lasts very long once it has become tinged with monotony. And so, sooner or later, the grieving person is left alone when she has still not finished grieving or when she’s no longer allowed to talk about what remains her only world, because other people find that world of grief unbearable, repellent.” p. 62 

“I want to be where he is, and the only place where we could coincide is the past, in that place of not being but of having been. He is past, whereas I am still present. If I were also past, at least I would be the same as him in that respect, which would be something, and I would be in no position to miss him or remember him. I would be on the same level as him or in the same dimension, in the same time, and we would not be left alone in this precarious world in which everything familiar is being taken away from us. nothing more can be taken away from us if we are not here. Nothing more can die on us if we are already dead.” p. 84 

“We tend to hope that, of the people and habits we cherish, no one will die and none will end, not realizing that the only thing that maintains those habits intact is their sudden withdrawal, with no possible alteration or evolution, before they can abandon us or we abandon them. Anything that lasts goes bad and putrefies, it bores us, turns against us, saturates and wearies us. How many people who once seemed vital to us are left by the wayside, how many relationships wear thin, become diluted for no apparent reason or certainly none of any weight. The only people who do not fail or let us down are those who are snatched from us, the only ones we don’t drop are those who abruptly disappear and so have no time to cause us pain or disappointment.” p. 107

The Infatuations is an international best seller; it is also included in this year’s long list for the International Foreign Fiction Prize. As one of the members of the Shadow Jury, I rate the story 6 out of 10, the writing 8 out of 10, and the potential longevity 7 out of 10. For, as Maria herself says, she longs to read “…the literature that time has sanctioned and miraculously authorized to ensure beyond the briefest of moments, which grows ever briefer.”

25 thoughts on “The Infatuations by Javier Marias”

  1. “That's another of the problems when one suffers a misfortune: the effects on the victim far outlast the patience of those prepared to listen and accompany her, unconditional support never lasts very long once it has become tinged with monotony. And so, sooner or later, the grieving person is left alone when she has still not finished grieving or when she's no longer allowed to talk about what remains her only world, because other people find that world of grief unbearable, repellent.” p. 62

    Yes. This quote is precisely what I've experienced with my own loss.

    I'm not sure this is a book for me, but you've written an exceptional review. Thank you for sharing those passages, Bellezza.


  2. Great review Bellezza, I too finished it yesterday, my review I'll do sometime today. Quite a simple plot but such depth to the musings. Another IFFP title that I'm glad I read.


  3. I am waiting for the day when I can finally read Javier Marias! (Not buying any books now, waiting for TBR to drastically go down first.) But even though you give the story 6 out of 10, I'm going by the writing, as most always.. 8 out of 10 seems really fine. Looking forward to it.


  4. That's a great review, Belleza. I read The Infatuations last year and am planning on rereading it next month if it makes the IFFP shortlist (which I very much hope it will). I love the long meandering style of Marias's writing and the way in which he delves deeply into some of the big themes in life – love, truth, mortality, grief.

    The passages concerning death and grief really resonate with me too. My father died suddenly in a freak accident when I was aged eleven, followed fifteen years later by my mother…and the the quote on page 62 speaks to me as it reflects my own experience at the time of my mother's death.

    A beautifully resonant novel and it's one that left me eager to read more by Marias,


  5. Isn't it interesting how the grieving paragraphs can still pop out at us after all these years? I suspect they always will. The book doesn't focus necessarily on death, I would say more in manipulation than morbidity, but still it's a present theme.


  6. There is a lot in this book to take hold of our thoughts, to dwell on and ponder. I think it would be a good book discussion book, too. I'm glad that you're fascinated by it as well, Beth.


  7. Indeed, on the surface the plot is simple. I'm not even sure how Marias stretched it to 300+ pages, other than adding all that bit about Balzac's novella and Dumas' The Three Muskateers. It would have been interesting to have Maria developed a little more. I wonder what happened to her going forward.


  8. I'm so excited by all the books on the long list for the IFFP this year. I have to caution myself against reading them too quickly and losing the beauty. Or, missing great pieces of it.


  9. I so understand the not buing any books now, Claire. Understand it, but am not necessarily following it. I've just ordered three from for my kindle because that's the only way I can access the titles for the IFFP. Our library has a mere three copies which saddens me greatly. I hope that you will get a chance to read Marias; I know how much you enjoyed Bolano, and I must say that I prefer Marias' much more.


  10. Is it just me, or do both Marias and Bolano meander through their novels? I wonder if it is a Spanish “thing” or just present in these to prominent authors. The big themes are there, to be sure, but one has to really dig to unearth all that is being said.

    I'm so sorry about the loss of your father at such an early age, as well as your mother. What sorrow you must have felt and still contend with on some level.

    This is a beautiful resonant novel, what a perfect way to put it.


  11. “He had a marked tendency to discourse and expound and digress, as I have noticed to be the case with many of the writers I meet at the publishing house, as if it weren’t enough for them to fill pages and pages with their thoughts and stories, which, with few exceptions, are either absurd, pretentious, gruesome or pathetic.” (p. 131)


  12. I loved Maria's commentary/stream of thought about working in the publishing house. All her frustration with the uppity or inferior authors, all the notions that she just wanted to read the quality literature which had stood the test of time.

    Fun how Javier Marias, and even Bolano in a part of 2666, point to the 'ridiculousness' of writers.


  13. Yes, I think you're right about Marias and Bolano, although I need to read more of Bolano's work. I've dipped into his short stories but I'd like to get to The Savage Detectives at some point.

    Thank you for your heartfelt words about the loss of my father and mother. Yes, it was a sad and difficult time, but many years have passed now. I, too, am saddened to hear of the loss of your husband and I think I can appreciate why you empathised and connected with Julia, the widow. I hope this book didn't stir up too many painful memories and emotions for you.

    All the best,


  14. I stumbled upon this book yesterday and glad that you have good reviews about this. Somehow the Independent Long list looks as exciting as the Bailey's Women List! 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s